Well, it's November again, and we all know what that means-a new Call of Duty is about to be released. This year, the third installment of the modern warfare is being released in what is possibly the most anticipated Call of Duty, and possibly most anticipated first person shooter of all time.
Now, as I write this, Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3's most fierce competitor has come out. Many people try to compare the two games, but in my opinion they are very different.Here's why;
The biggest difference between Battlefield 3 and MW3 would be the style of game play. Battlefield 3 is much more slow-paced, due to its much larger maps that require vehicles to navigate. In Call of Duty, the game play is much more fast-paced with smaller maps.
Battlefield 3, unlike MW3, is much more team and strategy based. In most Call of Duty games, you can easily win a game of search and destroy or even TDM by yourself. In Battlefield 3, you have to use teamwork with different classes such as medic and engineer to destroy enemy vehicles, repair friendly vehicles, or revive teammates.
Overall, it is unfair to try and compare the two games. Although they are both first person shooters, they vary by the speed and content. Battlefield 3 takes a little time to get used to, while Call of Duty is more of a pick up and go shooter. They are both fine games and I would recommend them to anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment